We are dealing with a public health crisis that, in global terms, may be the worst for simply over a century.
No surprise then that the coronavirus pandemic has pushed much of the stories that comprise our normal day-to-day diet of international news to the sidelines.
Nevertheless, numerous commentators are currently speculating about how international affairs might or might not alter in the wake of this drama.
That, however, is a long way off yet.
A more instant question is whether the behaviour of antagonistic countries – Iran and the United States, in this case – as they both struggle to challenge this emergency situation, might supply a twinkle of hope for a better relationship in the future?
The question is postured because Iran has actually been struck severely by the virus.
The number of reported cases is currently more than 17,000 and the death toll stands at 1,192, although lots of in Iran think the actual numbers are a lot greater.
Iran’s economy is currently compromised by United States sanctions and, although Washington firmly insists that humanitarian products – medical materials, for example – remain outside the sanctions net, the web of constraints on the Central Bank of Iran and the nation’s ability to trade with the outdoors world are only accentuating its problems.
Things have been made harder by transport disruption, border closures and so on, triggered by the broader effect of the pandemic.
As a step of Iran’s desperate need, it has taken the practically unmatched step of requesting a $5bn (₤ 4.25 bn) emergency loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
This is the first time for some 60 years that Iran has looked for IMF funds. A spokesperson for the organisation told me on Tuesday that the IMF “had discussions with the Iranian authorities to much better comprehend their ask for emergency situation financing” which “the conversations will continue in the days and weeks ahead”.
The US, as one of the IMF Executive Board’s most crucial members, will have a substantial say in whether Iran gets the cash.
Already there are calls from United States specialists for Iran not simply to be given what it needs, however also for the Trump administration to pursue a more compassionate approach to Iran’s health crisis in general.
Mark Fitzpatrick, an expert on arms control and the Iranian nuclear programme, firmly insisted that there was a minute now when a chance can be taken to break the log-jam.
” US policy towards Iran is stuck, failing to alter Iran’s behaviour other than for the even worse,” he tweeted on Monday.
Composing in the United States journal The American Conservative on Tuesday, Iran specialist Barbara Slavin argued that the concept, embraced by some US Republicans, that the pandemic might serve to prompt the topple of the Iranian program was ridiculous.
” The possibility of huge protests … seems slim given federal government instructions to stay house and logical fears that mass events will just spread the virus,” she wrote.
The United States treasury department, she noted, had taken some little actions to clarify that the humanitarian channel to Iran stayed open. However there had actually been no indicators that the Trump administration’s “optimal pressure” policy was being reconsidered, she added.
” It appears that the crisis will just push Iran deeper into the arms of China and Russia and enhance those in the program who turn down reconciliation with the West.”
” The Revolutionary Guards, who are handling much of the reaction to the virus and building emergency situation medical facilities,” she firmly insisted, “will grow even more effective as Iran pertains to look less and less like a theocracy with a thin republican veneer and more like a military dictatorship.”
So what then is the chance of even some modest rapprochement?
Not much if the public declarations of a few of the essential players are to be taken at face worth.
The Trump administration has looked for to score diplomatic points in this crisis.
The United States Secretary of State, Mike Pompeo, said earlier today that Iran’s leaders had “lied about the Wuhan virus for weeks”, and that they were “attempting to avoid obligation for their … gross incompetence”.
Note there the usage of the term “Wuhan infection”, which Mr Pompeo prefers to “coronavirus”.
Washington is seeking to have a jab at Beijing too, however similarly some Chinese figures have actually been all set to brand name the pandemic as some kind of conspiracy produced by the United States military.
But in regard to Iran, Mr Pompeo has actually gone even more.
He bluntly specified that “the Wuhan virus is a killer and the Iranian program is an accomplice”.
Nonetheless, he stated the United States was “attempting to offer assistance”.
” We have an open humanitarian channel … even as our optimum pressure campaign rejects terrorists money.”
In terms of possible military fight – keep in mind, simply a couple of weeks ago the United States and Iran appeared to be on the brink of war – there have been some indirect events.
They include rocket attacks on Iraqi military bases utilized by US-led union forces that the Americans believe were brought out by a pro-Iranian Shia militia. One attack killed 3 coalition service personnel – among them a British medic – and the United States responded with air campaign.
General Frank McKenzie of CentCom, the guy in charge of US forces in the Middle East, informed the Senate Armed Providers Committee recently that the coronavirus outbreak may make a weakened Iran “more harmful”.
The US is definitely not taking any dangers, unusually keeping 2 aircraft providers in the region.
Real Life. Real News. Real Voices.
Get our latest stories sent to you.Join our Newsletter
Of course, the indirect culpability of Iran in such attacks is always objected to – certainly by the Iranians themselves.
This is not always a tap that Tehran can simply turn on and off at will. Numerous of its proxies have local concerns and goals.
The Shia militias in Iraq are excited to require the Americans out. However Iran could most likely do a lot to scale down the frequency or severity of occurrences.
Certainly, in general the pandemic does appear to be reducing military conflict in the broader region.
On the Iran-Israel front in Syria, things appear to be significantly quieter. And Gen McKenzie also noted that the US may need to “eventually live with a low-level of proxy attacks”, a statement that lowers a few of the drama from the scenario.
The Iranian leadership too has actually been talking hard.
President Hassan Rouhani kept in mind on Wednesday that Iran had reacted to the US killing of the renowned Revolutionary Guards General Qasem Soleimani in January, however likewise making clear that this response would continue.
” The Americans assassinated our great commander,” he stated in a televised speech. “We have actually reacted to that terrorist act and will react to it.”
So, on the face of it, there’s not much chance of taking the sting out of the US-Iran relationship.
Washington’s mindset to the IMF loan might be a tip to how things may establish. And undoubtedly rhetoric should not necessarily be taken at face value.
At the end of February, the United States got in touch with Iran via the Swiss federal government to say that it was “prepared to assist the Iranian people in their action efforts”.
Just on Tuesday, Mr Pompeo, in addition to his tough words to both Tehran and Beijing, mentioned his hope that Tehran might be considering launching some Americans detained in the nation.
The short-term release of the British-Iranian female Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe is another little guideline of a shift in Tehran.
At the end of the day, Iran may well need to tacitly restrain a few of the groups who have the Americans and other Western forces in their sights.
They will require to launch detained foreign nationals.
And the Trump administration will need to choose whether this is an opportunity to produce a little opening with Tehran along sound humanitarian grounds or, whether the mounting pressure on the regime from both sanctions and now the coronavirus, is a moment to double-down.
It could be a fateful decision for what comes next when the pandemic has actually passed.
Stay in the know.
Get our free newsletter.
Expect in-depth toplines of our best stories.
Tap in and keep your curiosity satisfied.
We hate SPAM and promise to keep your email address safe.